Athar Faridi

🔒 Access Modifiers

The statement about access modifiers highlights a key difference between Go (Golang) and C# in how they control the visibility of variables, functions, and other members. Go uses a simple, implicit system based on capitalization, while C# provides explicit, fine-grained access modifiers to manage visibility and encapsulation. Below, I elaborate on each point with examples, followed by a difference table summarizing the key distinctions.

Elaboration with Examples

Visibility Control Mechanism:

Go:

Go does not use explicit access modifiers. Instead, visibility is determined by the capitalization of identifiers:
- Capitalized identifiers (e.g., Name, FuncName) are public and can be accessed from outside the package.
- Lowercase identifiers (e.g., name, funcName) are private to the package they are defined in.
This approach aligns with Go’s philosophy of simplicity, eliminating the need for keywords like public or private.

Example:

package mypackage
import "fmt"
// Public struct and field
type Person struct {
    Name string // Public (exported)
    age  int   // Private (unexported)
}
// Public function
func SayHello() {
    fmt.Println("Hello from mypackage")
}
// Private function
func sayGoodbye() {
    fmt.Println("Goodbye from mypackage")
}

package main
import (
    "fmt"
    "mypackage"
)
func main() {
    p := mypackage.Person{Name: "Alice"}
    fmt.Println(p.Name) // Outputs: Alice
    // fmt.Println(p.age) // Error: p.age is unexported
    mypackage.SayHello() // Outputs: Hello from mypackage
    // mypackage.sayGoodbye() // Error: sayGoodbye is unexported
}

The Name field and SayHello function are accessible outside mypackage because they are capitalized, while age and sayGoodbye are private to the package.

C#:

C# uses explicit access modifiers (public, private, protected, internal, protected internal, private protected) to control visibility. These modifiers are applied to classes, fields, methods, and other members, providing clear and precise control over access.

Example:

using System;
namespace MyNamespace {
    public class Person {
        public string Name;     // Accessible everywhere
        private int age;        // Accessible only within Person class
        protected int Id;       // Accessible in Person and derived classes
        internal string Role;    // Accessible within the same assembly
        public Person(string name, int age) {
            Name = name;
            this.age = age;
        }
        public void PrintAge() {
            Console.WriteLine(age); // Accessible within class
        }
    }
    class Program {
        static void Main() {
            Person p = new Person("Alice", 30);
            Console.WriteLine(p.Name); // Outputs: Alice
            // Console.WriteLine(p.age); // Error: age is private
            Console.WriteLine(p.Role); // Outputs: (if set, accessible in same assembly)
        }
    }
}

C#’s explicit modifiers clearly define the scope of access, with public for universal access, private for class-only access, and other modifiers for specific scenarios.

Granularity of Control:

Go:

Go’s visibility control is coarse-grained, operating at the package level. Capitalization provides only two levels of access: package-private (lowercase) or public (uppercase). There’s no equivalent to protected or internal for finer control within hierarchies or assemblies.

Example:

package mypackage
type Employee struct {
    Name string // Public (exported)
    salary int // Private to package
}
func GetSalary(e Employee) int {
    return e.salary // Accessible within the same package
}

package main
import (
    "fmt"
    "mypackage"
)
func main() {
    e := mypackage.Employee{Name: "Bob"}
    fmt.Println(e.Name) // Outputs: Bob
    // fmt.Println(e.salary) // Error: salary is unexported
    fmt.Println(mypackage.GetSalary(e)) // Outputs: (salary value, accessible via package function)
}

The salary field is private to the mypackage package, and external code must use package functions like GetSalary to access it, limiting control over sub-package or inheritance-based access.

C#:

C# offers fine-grained control over visibility with multiple access modifiers:
- public: Accessible everywhere.
- private: Accessible only within the containing class.
- protected: Accessible within the class and derived classes.
- internal: Accessible within the same assembly.
- protected internal: Accessible within the same assembly or derived classes.
- private protected: Accessible only in derived classes within the same assembly.
This allows precise control over who can access members, especially in complex class hierarchies or large projects.

Example:

using System;
namespace MyNamespace {
    public class Employee {
        public string Name;           // Accessible everywhere
        private int salary;           // Accessible only in Employee
        protected int Id;             // Accessible in Employee and derived classes
        internal string Department;   // Accessible in same assembly
        public Employee(string name, int salary) {
            Name = name;
            this.salary = salary;
        }
        protected void PrintSalary() {
            Console.WriteLine(salary); // Accessible within class
        }
    }
    public class Manager : Employee {
        public Manager(string name, int salary) : base(name, salary) { }
        public void ShowDetails() {
            Console.WriteLine(Id); // Accessible (protected)
            PrintSalary();         // Accessible (protected)
        }
    }
}
class Program {
    static void Main() {
        Employee e = new Employee("Bob", 50000);
        Console.WriteLine(e.Name);       // Outputs: Bob
        Console.WriteLine(e.Department); // Outputs: (if set, accessible in same assembly)
        // Console.WriteLine(e.salary);   // Error: salary is private
        // e.PrintSalary();              // Error: PrintSalary is protected
    }
}

C#’s modifiers allow precise control, such as restricting salary to the Employee class while allowing Id and PrintSalary to be accessed by derived classes like Manager.

Philosophy and Implications:

Go:

Go’s capitalization-based system is simple and implicit, reducing boilerplate and aligning with its minimalist philosophy. However, it lacks the flexibility to define access at levels other than package or public, which can limit encapsulation in complex systems.

Example:

package mypackage
type Config struct {
    PublicKey  string // Exported
    privateKey string // Package-private
}
func NewConfig(publicKey, privateKey string) Config {
    return Config{PublicKey: publicKey, privateKey: privateKey}
}

package main
import (
    "fmt"
    "mypackage"
)
func main() {
    c := mypackage.NewConfig("pub123", "priv456")
    fmt.Println(c.PublicKey) // Outputs: pub123
    // fmt.Println(c.privateKey) // Error: privateKey is unexported
}

The privateKey field is only accessible within mypackage, and external code must rely on package functions for interaction, enforcing encapsulation at the package level.

C#:

C#’s explicit modifiers provide a robust and flexible system for encapsulation, supporting complex OOP designs and large-scale applications. However, this adds complexity, as developers must carefully choose the appropriate modifier for each member.

Example:

using System;
namespace MyNamespace {
    public class Config {
        public string PublicKey;           // Accessible everywhere
        private string privateKey;         // Accessible only in Config
        protected internal string ApiToken; // Accessible in assembly or derived classes
        public Config(string publicKey, string privateKey) {
            PublicKey = publicKey;
            this.privateKey = privateKey;
        }
        public string GetPrivateKey() {
            return privateKey; // Controlled access via method
        }
    }
    public class SecureConfig : Config {
        public SecureConfig(string publicKey, string privateKey) : base(publicKey, privateKey) { }
        public void ShowToken() {
            Console.WriteLine(ApiToken); // Accessible (protected internal)
        }
    }
}
class Program {
    static void Main() {
        Config c = new Config("pub123", "priv456");
        Console.WriteLine(c.PublicKey);      // Outputs: pub123
        Console.WriteLine(c.GetPrivateKey()); // Outputs: priv456
        // Console.WriteLine(c.privateKey);   // Error: privateKey is private
        Console.WriteLine(c.ApiToken);       // Outputs: (if set, accessible in same assembly)
    }
}

C#’s fine-grained modifiers allow ApiToken to be accessed in derived classes or the same assembly, while privateKey remains restricted, offering precise control over visibility.

Difference Table

Aspect	Go	C#
Visibility Control	Implicit via capitalization: uppercase (public), lowercase (package-private)	Explicit modifiers: `public`, `private`, `protected`, `internal`, etc.
Granularity	Coarse-grained: package or public only	Fine-grained: class, derived classes, assembly, or combinations
Philosophy	Simple, implicit, package-level encapsulation	Robust, explicit, supports complex OOP designs

Memory Management Concurrency